Skip to main content
Glama
rog0x

mcp-dep-tools

by rog0x
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-dep-tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-npm-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server providing npm registry search, package details, dependency auditing, bundle size estimation, and package comparison tools for AI agents.
      5
      25 npm
      MIT

    • freshdeps-mcp

      SolvoHQ
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that checks npm and PyPI package health, providing maintenance signals, version info, CVE counts, and alternative suggestions.
      MIT

    • Thask

      kimgh06
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides 25 tools for AI agents to query and modify a dependency graph, enabling impact analysis and provenance tracking for AI-assisted development.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool clearly targets a distinct aspect of dependency management: size estimation, tree visualization, license checking, outdated detection, and security audit. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'dep_<verb>_<object>' pattern with snake_case. The only slight deviation is 'dep_find_outdated' using 'find' instead of 'check' or 'analyze', but the pattern remains clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server covers the main concerns of dependency analysis (size, tree, licenses, outdated, security) without being too sparse or bloated. The count is well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools provide comprehensive coverage for inspecting dependencies. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of a tool to automatically update or fix issues, but the analysis functionality is complete for typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources