Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Highway MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to execute gated, multi-step workflows in a fixed order, with engine-checked tasks and controlled stage unlocking. It exposes workflow state, task completion, and human approval controls through MCP.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, execute, and inspect actions across business systems through three compact MCP tools, backed by server-side policy, single-use human approvals, and durable idempotent execution that prevents duplicate side effects.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run declarative agents and DAG workflows as plain tools, with parallel nodes, review loops, and per-run least-privilege sandboxing.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP agents to run, continue, observe, check status of, and abort bounded GUI automation tasks through a shared local runtime with visual detection and deterministic input.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables users to submit goals via MCP so a host agent can generate scripts, coordinate subagents, monitor execution stages, recover interrupted runs, and deliver reusable artifacts.
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: 'approve' handles pending actions, 'get_status' tracks run progress, 'run_goal' starts a new run, and 'schedule_goal' sets up recurring runs. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (get_status, run_goal, schedule_goal), but 'approve' omits the noun. The pattern is mostly consistent and readable, with a minor deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose of managing durable agent runs with approvals. Each tool is essential and the set is concise without being sparse.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover starting, scheduling, checking status, and approving runs, but missing cancellation or deletion capabilities (e.g., cancel_run, delete_schedule) are notable gaps that agents may need.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues