deepanime-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@deepanime-mcpwhat are the available anime styles?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Deep Anime AI MCP Server
Deep Anime: Character Art, Portraits, and Scene Design
A Model Context Protocol server that exposes the canonical Deep Anime AI knowledge surface β image generation workflows and styles, pricing, FAQ, official links β to MCP-compatible AI clients such as Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and Continue. Read-only, no API keys, no quota, ~50 ms cold start.
Official website: https://deepanime.org
π¨ About Deep Anime AI
Deep Anime (deepanime.org) is an AI image generation platform built specifically for anime-style artwork. It lets users create polished character art, portraits, and scene compositions by typing a text prompt, converting a photograph, or remixing an existing design. Rather than offering a generic image generator with an anime filter bolted on, the site provides a focused suite of tools designed around the anime aesthetic β covering everything from initial concept to final touch-ups within a single integrated workspace. Both casual creators experimenting with character ideas and more serious illustrators looking for fast iteration cycles can access the platform through tiered subscription plans.
Related MCP server: Muse AI Image MCP Server
Key Features
Text-to-Image (Prompt to Character Art): Describe a scene or character in plain text and the platform renders it as anime-style art, with pre-built prompt templates available in a gallery for inspiration.
Photo to Anime: Upload a photograph and convert it into stylized anime artwork, with attention to preserving facial details and likeness during the transformation.
Character Art Generator: Build original character designs from scratch, controlling style, pose, and visual identity without needing source photography.
Anime Image Editor: Adjust composition, color grading, and fine details on generated images directly in the platform, removing the need to export to a separate editor for basic refinements.
Character Face Swap: Swap or transplant character faces across different images while maintaining consistent visual style.
Character Consistency Across Angles: Remix workflows allow users to iterate on the same character β testing different outfits, poses, or angles β while preserving the core character identity across variations.
Use Cases
Portrait creation and stylization: Turning personal photos or reference images into anime-style profile pictures or character portraits.
Character design and development: Building out original characters for manga, webcomics, visual novels, or game concepts through iterative generation.
Scene and concept art: Composing multi-element scenes with specific backgrounds, lighting moods, and character placements for storytelling or world-building projects.
Outfit and pose iteration: Testing visual variations on an established character design β changing costumes, expressions, or viewpoints β without losing character consistency.
Content creation for social media: Producing anime-style illustrated content for profile images, fan art, or creative posts at a faster pace than hand-drawing.
Who Is It For
Deep Anime is aimed at two overlapping groups. The first is casual creators β fans, hobbyists, and social media users β who want to generate anime-style images of themselves, original characters, or fictional scenes without prior illustration skills or software knowledge. The second group is more production-focused: indie game developers, comic creators, visual novel writers, and digital illustrators who need a quick and consistent way to prototype character designs or generate reference art. The platform's pricing (with a Lite tier and a Pro tier) reflects this range, making entry-level access affordable while offering higher generation volumes and additional features to users with more demanding workflows.
Tools
list_styles
Return the canonical list of image-generation styles or presets the site exposes. (Deep Anime AI)
Input: no parameters. Returns: text/markdown.
get_pricing
Return the canonical pricing entry point for Deep Anime AI.
Input: no parameters. Returns: text/markdown.
get_official_links
Return the canonical list of official links for Deep Anime AI (website, support, docs when available).
Input: no parameters. Returns: text/markdown.
Resources
site://deepanime/stylesβ Supported image-generation styles and presets.site://deepanime/pricingβ Canonical pricing entry point.site://deepanime/faqβ Short FAQ generated from public site metadata.site://deepanime/linksβ Canonical URLs to share with users.
Prompts
tell_me_about_deepanime
Summarize what the site is, who it's for, and how it works. β Deep Anime AI
try_image_style_deepanime
Recommend a starting image-generation style for a stated goal. β Deep Anime AI
Installation
Install via Smithery
npx -y @smithery/cli install deepanime-mcp --client claude(Replace claude with cursor, windsurf, or continue for those clients.)
Install from source
git clone https://github.com/rocnubie/deepanime-mcp.git
cd deepanime-mcp
pnpm installThen add to your MCP client config (claude_desktop_config.json for Claude Desktop, mcp.json for Cursor / Windsurf / Continue):
{
"mcpServers": {
"deepanime-mcp": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/deepanime-mcp/src/index.mjs"
]
}
}
}Debug with MCP Inspector
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node src/index.mjsOfficial Links
Website: https://deepanime.org
Pricing: https://deepanime.org/pricing
Support: support@deepanime.org
Development
pnpm install
pnpm start # run the server over stdioLicense
MIT
Available Tools
3 toolsget_official_linksA
Return the canonical list of official links for Deep Anime AI (website, support, docs when available).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Return' implies read-only, and 'canonical' plus 'when available' provides some context about the nature and conditional inclusion of docs. However, it does not disclose return format, ordering, or any other behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the action and resource. Every word earns its place, with no superfluous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple no-parameter tool with no output schema, the description adequately explains the return value: a canonical list of official links, specifying the types. Minor ambiguities like ordering or exact format are not present, but the description is sufficient given the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter meaning, and it doesn't mention any parameters, which is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Return') with a clear resource ('canonical list of official links for Deep Anime AI') and lists the link types ('website, support, docs when available'). It clearly distinguishes from siblings (list_styles, get_pricing) which address different concerns.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or contextual cues. It simply states what it does without telling the agent when this is the appropriate choice.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_pricingB
Return the canonical pricing entry point for Deep Anime AI.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
There are no annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states that the tool returns a pricing entry point, with no mention of whether it is read-only, requires authentication, or what the return format looks like. This lack of behavior disclosure is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the action ('Return') and the resource, making it easy to scan. It is appropriately sized for a tool with no parameters and no complex behavior to describe.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and no annotations, the description must fully explain what the tool returns. 'Canonical pricing entry point' is ambiguousβit does not clarify whether it is a URL, an object, or a string. For such a simple tool, this lack of detail makes the description incomplete for an agent to use confidently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the input schema provides complete coverage. According to the rubric, a 0-parameter case receives a baseline score of 4 since there are no parameter semantics for the description to elaborate. The description appropriately does not attempt to add parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Return') and identifies a clear resource ('canonical pricing entry point'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_styles and get_official_links. However, 'pricing entry point' is slightly vague, as it could refer to a URL, an object, or a method, preventing a perfect score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and no exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned. The absence of any contextual hints leaves the agent to infer usage solely from the tool name and resource reference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_stylesA
Return the canonical list of image-generation styles or presets the site exposes. (Deep Anime AI)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states what the tool returns, which is appropriate for a read-only list operation. However, it does not mention any additional behaviors such as whether the list is cached, sorted, or subject to change, leaving some ambiguity about the 'canonical' nature.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the essential information without any superfluous detail. It is well-structured and front-loaded with the action and resource, making it immediately understandable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no output schema), the description provides sufficient information to understand its purpose and expected return value. The sibling tool names further contextualize it as part of a collection of reference-related tools, making it complete in this context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the description does not need to clarify parameter meanings. The baseline for 0-param tools is 4, and the description adds value by specifying what the returned list contains (styles/presets), aligning with the schema's empty properties.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: to return the canonical list of image-generation styles or presets. The verb 'Return' and resource 'canonical list' are specific, and the parenthetical '(Deep Anime AI)' adds context. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_pricing and get_official_links.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives, but the 'canonical' phrasing implies this is the authoritative source for styles, which provides clear context. Since the tool has no parameters and is a simple list retrieval, the intended use case is self-evident, though explicit exclusions are missing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
3 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
get_official_links - First observed
get_pricing - First observed
list_styles
TDQS
Each tool targets a distinct piece of information: styles, pricing, and official links. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.
All tool names follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_styles, get_pricing, get_official_links), making them predictable and readable.
With only 3 tools, the set is compact but well-scoped for an informational server. It fits the lower end of the ideal range, but each tool serves a distinct purpose and nothing feels redundant or excessive.
The domain appears to be 'canonical info about Deep Anime AI.' The toolset covers styles, pricing, and official links, which are the core needs. Minor gaps such as detailed style info or FAQ are possible, but the surface is reasonable for its purpose.
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Generate AI images and videos from any compatible MCP client.
MCP server for NanoBanana AI image generation and editing
MCP server for Flux AI image generation
MCP server for Hailuo (MiniMax) AI video generation
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the DeepGHS anime AI ecosystem. Dataset discovery, tag search, character dataset finder, and training pipeline code generation.81MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server exposing Muse AI Image's styles, pricing, FAQ, and official links to AI clients like Claude Desktop, enabling knowledge retrieval without API keys.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes Meigen AI's image generation styles, pricing, FAQ, and official links to AI clients.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server exposing AI Room Design's image generation styles, pricing, FAQ, and official links to MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf.3MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rocnubie/deepanime-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server