Dichiarazione-MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| session_statusA | Return coarse browser/workflow state without session secrets. |
| read_declaration_draftC | Read one normalized synthetic declaration draft. |
| read_normalized_evidenceB | Read bounded normalized synthetic evidence with exact session binding. |
| mutate_declaration_draftA | Apply one typed draft mutation and return its exact rollback receipt. |
| revert_declaration_mutationC | Revert one confirmed draft mutation exactly once from its receipt. |
| validate_declaration_draftC | Validate one exact draft version. |
| prepare_declaration_reviewC | Prepare review data; this cannot issue or consume approval. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools target distinct concerns: reading drafts, reading evidence, validating, mutating, reverting, and preparing review. However, read_declaration_draft and read_normalized_evidence both read bounded session-bound content and could be confused in scope. The naming clearly differentiates them by object type, so ambiguity is low.
Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (read_, validate_, mutate_, revert_, prepare_). The main deviation is session_status, which uses noun_status instead of a verb_noun form, though it's still readable and predictable alongside the pattern.
Seven tools is a reasonable, slightly tight count for a declaration workflow server. Each tool earns its place and there's a clear lifecycle: read, validate, mutate, revert, review. It feels appropriately scoped with room to grow.
The set covers the core declaration workflow: read draft, validate, mutate, revert mutations, and prepare review. Minor gaps exist—there's no obvious create/get initial draft or final approval/submission tool—but the stated purpose (working with normalized synthetic drafts and evidence) appears largely covered.