Skip to main content
Glama
robworks-code

icloud-mcp

by robworks-code
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to icloud-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • icloud-docs-mcp

      js713-lab
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables read-only iCloud Drive access over MCP, allowing users to browse folders, search filenames, download files, and extract document text.
      5
      2
      MIT

    • icloud-mail-calendar-contacts

      eruveo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables access to iCloud mail, calendars, and contacts over MCP through IMAP/SMTP, CalDAV, and CardDAV, with configurable read/write and deletion permissions.
      2
      MIT

    • iCloud MCP

      russellkmoore
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to read and search iCloud mail, draft messages (never sent), manage calendar events with a preview/commit gate, and look up contacts via IMAP, CalDAV, and CardDAV.
      76 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct operations, but a few pairs overlap: icloud_read_file vs icloud_download (inline text vs save-to-disk) and icloud_upload vs icloud_write_file (local file vs string content). Descriptions clarify these boundaries, so misselection risk is low but nonzero.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a uniform icloud_ prefix and lowercase snake_case, which is predictable. The only minor deviation is mixing bare nouns (status, list, info) with verb_noun forms (read_file, write_file, list_trash), but it remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal range and each one covers a distinct file/folder lifecycle operation. Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers create (mkdir, write_file, upload), read (list, info, search, read_file, download), update (rename, move, overwrite), and delete/restore (trash, list_trash, restore) — strong lifecycle coverage. Minor gaps like copy or share/permission operations exist but are workaroundable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources