Ghost + Contentful MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ghost + Contentful MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Ghost CMS content through MCP, with read tools for posts, pages, tags, and members, plus draft-safe write tools that cannot publish or delete.4,678 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceManage your Ghost blog content directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client, allowing you to create, edit, search, and delete posts with support for tag management and analytics.8 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve information from the official Magnolia CMS documentation through a set of MCP tools.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform web searches and extract full-text content from web pages via standard MCP tools, with fallback search and semantic reranking.22MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables intent-based semantic search over external design system documentation, allowing MCP-compatible AI assistants to retrieve relevant design tokens, component architectures, and code patterns via a single tool.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, retrieve, and summarize content from workplace tools including Google Drive, Notion, Slack, and Confluence through secure Model Context Protocol.-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct content type (learn pages, case studies, events, blog posts, blog pages), and the descriptions clearly specify the fields searched. There is no ambiguity between Contentful and Ghost entities.
All tool names follow the exact same verb_noun pattern: 'search_' followed by a specific content type. This is perfectly consistent and predictable.
The server has 5 tools, well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool covers a distinct searchable content type, so every tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.
The tool surface is entirely search-focused, covering the apparent primary content types across both CMSs. Minor gaps exist, such as no ability to fetch a single content item by ID or search across all content types at once, but these are not critical for a search-oriented server.