Skip to main content
Glama
robrobgr

mcp-redline

by robrobgr
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-redline

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RefSentry

      LloydPhuc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to verify citations and bibliographies and to check whether source documents support factual claims, using local inference, exact evidence provenance, and deterministic verdicts.
      MIT

    • genpark-agent-hallucination

      Alpha-Park
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP clients to decompose text into atomic claims and cross-verify them against reference knowledge to flag ungrounded claims, numerical contradictions, and hallucinated entities. Runs deterministically with zero dependencies over JSON-RPC stdio, avoiding LLM round-trips for routine verification tasks.
      7
      -

    • OpenGATE

      nickjlamb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open-source verification for evidence-grounded AI. Runs deterministic grounding checks of AI outputs against source evidence, with no LLM judge.
      2
      1
      72 npm
      2
      MIT

    • Evidence Gate

      AnotherMeatsack
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run local, model-backed decisions on short passages and routing choices, and to check whether exactly supplied text supports a scientific claim, returning the full probability distribution, review-policy status, and provenance details. All evaluation stays on the local machine with no cloud inference, and flagged results are surfaced for human review rather than treated as conclusions.
      MIT

    • Cheap Research

      Core-Fidelity
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A bounded evidence review engine that ingests documents, extracts evidence for a given claim, detects contradictions, and produces auditable evidence packets without hallucinations or open-web research.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    search (fuzzy retrieval returning ranked quotes), quote (exact section retrieval), and verify (claim adjudication) have distinguishable purposes, though search's returned quotes and quote's verbatim text create minor conceptual overlap. Boundaries are clarified by descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case and action-oriented, but list_sources is a verb_noun compound while search, quote, and verify are bare verbs, a minor deviation. The convention is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a tight, well-scoped set for a read-only corpus retrieval and verification server, with each tool earning its place. It sits at the thin end of the ideal 3-15 range but is not under-scoped for the purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery (list_sources), retrieval (search, quote), and adjudication (verify), which is complete for a read-only corpus server. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to enumerate sections/pages within a document or filter search by authority tier.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources