Robot Resources Scraper
@robot-resources/scraper-mcp
⚠️ DESPRECADO — integrado en
@robot-resources/scraper. Este servidor MCP ahora se distribuye como un binarioscraper-mcpintegrado dentro del paquete principal de scraper. Instala un paquete, obtén el MCP. Configuración automática mediantenpx robot-resources --for=cursoronpx robot-resources --for=claude-code. Las herramientas (scraper_compress_url,scraper_crawl_url) y los parámetros a continuación no han cambiado.
Servidor MCP para Scraper — compresión de contexto para agentes de IA.
¿Qué es Robot Resources?
Recursos Humanos, pero para tus agentes de IA.
Robot Resources otorga a los agentes de IA dos superpoderes:
Router — Dirige cada llamada de LLM al modelo capaz más económico. Ahorros de costos del 60-90% en OpenAI, Anthropic y Google.
Scraper — Comprime páginas web a markdown limpio. 70-80% menos de tokens por página.
Ambos se ejecutan localmente. Tus claves de API nunca salen de tu máquina. Gratis, ilimitado, sin niveles.
Instala la suite completa
npx robot-resourcesUn comando configura todo. Aprende más en robotresources.ai
Related MCP server: Scraper MCP
Acerca de este servidor MCP
Este paquete proporciona a los agentes de IA dos herramientas para comprimir contenido web en markdown eficiente en tokens a través del Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo: compresión de una sola página y rastreo BFS de múltiples páginas.
Instalación
npx @robot-resources/scraper-mcpO instálalo globalmente:
npm install -g @robot-resources/scraper-mcpConfiguración de Claude Desktop
Añade a tu claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"scraper": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@robot-resources/scraper-mcp"]
}
}
}Herramientas
scraper_compress_url
Comprime una sola página web en markdown con un 70-90% menos de tokens.
Parámetros:
Parámetro | Tipo | Requerido | Predeterminado | Descripción |
| string | sí | — | URL a comprimir |
| string | no |
|
|
| number | no |
| Tiempo de espera de obtención en milisegundos |
| number | no |
| Intentos máximos de reintento (0-10) |
Ejemplo de prompt: "Compress https://docs.example.com/getting-started"
scraper_crawl_url
Rastrea múltiples páginas desde una URL inicial usando descubrimiento de enlaces BFS.
Parámetros:
Parámetro | Tipo | Requerido | Predeterminado | Descripción |
| string | sí | — | URL inicial para rastrear |
| number | no |
| Páginas máximas a rastrear (1-100) |
| number | no |
| Profundidad máxima de enlace (0-5) |
| string | no |
|
|
| string[] | no | — | Patrones de URL a incluir (glob) |
| string[] | no | — | Patrones de URL a excluir (glob) |
| number | no |
| Tiempo de espera por página en milisegundos |
Ejemplo de prompt: "Crawl the docs at https://docs.example.com with max 20 pages"
Modos de obtención
Modo | Cómo | Usar cuando |
| HTTP simple | Sitios predeterminados, APIs, docs |
| Suplantación de huella TLS | Sitios protegidos contra bots |
| Navegador headless (Playwright) | SPAs renderizadas con JS |
| Rápido → respaldo stealth en 403/desafío | Sitios desconocidos (predeterminado) |
Stealth requiere impit y render requiere playwright como dependencias de par de @robot-resources/scraper.
Requisitos
Node.js 18+
Relacionado
@robot-resources/scraper - Biblioteca de compresión central
@robot-resources/router-mcp - Servidor MCP para optimización de costos de LLM
Robot Resources - Recursos Humanos, pero para tus agentes de IA
Licencia
MIT
Available Tools
2 toolsscraper_compress_urlB
Compress web content from a URL for reduced token usage. Returns markdown with 70-90% fewer tokens than raw HTML.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | URL to compress | |
| mode | No | Fetch mode: 'fast' (plain HTTP), 'stealth' (TLS fingerprint), 'render' (headless browser), 'auto' (fast with fallback). Default: 'auto' | |
| timeout | No | Fetch timeout in milliseconds (default: 10000) | |
| maxRetries | No | Max retry attempts (default: 3) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the token reduction benefit but fails to disclose critical traits like rate limits, authentication needs, error handling, or what happens with invalid URLs. The description is minimal and does not compensate for the lack of annotations, leaving significant gaps in understanding the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is highly concise and front-loaded, consisting of two sentences that directly state the tool's function and outcome without any fluff. Every sentence earns its place by delivering essential information efficiently, making it easy to grasp the tool's purpose quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of a tool with 4 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on behavioral aspects, error cases, and output format beyond 'markdown,' failing to provide sufficient context for safe and effective use. The description does not compensate for the absence of structured data, leaving key operational questions unanswered.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, providing clear details for all parameters (url, mode, timeout, maxRetries). The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already explains, such as usage examples or implications of mode choices. Thus, it meets the baseline score of 3, as the schema adequately covers parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('compress') and resource ('web content from a URL'), and distinguishes it from its sibling 'scraper_crawl_url' by focusing on token reduction rather than crawling. It explicitly mentions the outcome: 'Returns markdown with 70-90% fewer tokens than raw HTML.'
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its sibling 'scraper_crawl_url' or any alternatives. It lacks context about prerequisites, such as when compression is beneficial or when to choose specific modes, offering only a basic functional statement without comparative or exclusionary advice.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
scraper_crawl_urlA
Crawl multiple pages from a starting URL using BFS link discovery. Returns compressed markdown for each page with 70-90% fewer tokens than raw HTML.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Starting URL to crawl | |
| maxPages | No | Max pages to crawl (default: 10) | |
| maxDepth | No | Max link depth (default: 2) | |
| mode | No | Fetch mode: 'fast' (plain HTTP), 'stealth' (TLS fingerprint), 'render' (headless browser), 'auto' (fast with fallback). Default: 'auto' | |
| include | No | URL patterns to include (glob) | |
| exclude | No | URL patterns to exclude (glob) | |
| timeout | No | Per-page timeout in milliseconds (default: 10000) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden and does well by disclosing key behavioral traits: the BFS crawling algorithm, multi-page scope, and the 70-90% token reduction in output. It doesn't mention rate limits, authentication needs, or error handling, but provides substantial operational context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences that efficiently convey the core functionality and key output characteristic. Every word earns its place with no redundancy or unnecessary elaboration. The description is front-loaded with the primary action and scope.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 7-parameter tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description provides good operational context but lacks details about return format structure, error conditions, or performance characteristics. It mentions compressed markdown output but doesn't describe the data structure or pagination approach.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-specific information beyond what's already in the schema descriptions. It mentions 'starting URL' which is covered by the url parameter description, but doesn't elaborate on parameter interactions or usage patterns.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with specific verbs ('crawl multiple pages', 'returns compressed markdown') and resources ('starting URL', 'BFS link discovery'). It distinguishes from the sibling tool scraper_compress_url by emphasizing multi-page crawling rather than single-page compression.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage context through 'crawl multiple pages' and 'starting URL', suggesting this is for web scraping tasks. However, it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool versus the sibling scraper_compress_url or other alternatives, nor does it provide exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v0.1.2- First observed
scraper_compress_url - First observed
scraper_crawl_url
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: scraper_compress_url handles single-page compression, while scraper_crawl_url performs multi-page crawling with BFS link discovery. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (scraper_compress_url and scraper_crawl_url), using the same prefix and snake_case style throughout. The naming is predictable and uniform.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a scraper domain, lacking essential operations like error handling, configuration, or content filtering. This minimal set may limit agent workflows and cause dead ends.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for web scraping; it misses basic CRUD-like operations such as updating crawl parameters, deleting cached data, or retrieving specific page elements. Agents will struggle with incomplete coverage.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Web scraping for AI agents. Converts URLs to clean, LLM-ready Markdown with anti-bot bypass.
Web pages and whole sites to clean Markdown for RAG and AI agents. Crawls links and sitemaps.
1Cloud scraping & crawling API for AI agents. Turn any URL into clean, LLM-ready markdown.
Web scraping for AI agents: scrape, search, crawl, map any website to markdown + JSON. No browser.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceFast, token-efficient web content extraction tool that converts websites to clean Markdown for AI agents, featuring smart caching, content extraction with Mozilla Readability, and polite crawling capabilities.1503 npm161MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA context-optimized web scraping server that converts HTML to markdown/text and applies CSS selectors server-side, reducing token usage by 70-90% while providing AI tools with clean, filtered web content.7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFetches web pages and converts them to clean, readable markdown format by extracting main content while removing navigation, ads, and other non-essential elements to minimize token usage.4-

stripfeed-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConverts any URL to clean, token-efficient Markdown for AI agents. Strips ads, navigation, and scripts. Supports CSS selectors, batch processing (10 URLs), token counting, and smart caching.33 npmMIT