m365-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to m365-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Microsoft 365 email, calendar, and contacts through natural language, with zero Azure setup required.1510MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft Graph API services including Outlook email, Calendar events, OneDrive files, and Contacts. Supports multiple Microsoft accounts with unified search across all services.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft 365 services (users, mail, calendar, files) via Microsoft Graph API.23 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Microsoft 365 via the Graph API, enabling email search, attachment extraction, and OneDrive file reading through natural conversation.-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft 365 and Office services through the Microsoft Graph API, providing tools for email, calendar, files, Teams, SharePoint, and more with configurable permissions and output formats.188MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Microsoft 365 accounts to manage emails, calendars, files, and Teams messages. It offers 71 tools and supports multi-user environments through a secure, customizable server architecture.55-
TDQS
Scored across 85 tools
Tools are mostly distinct due to clear resource grouping (email_, calendar_, etc.). A few convenience wrappers (email_mark_read, email_flag) overlap with email_update but are well-described as simpler alternatives, causing minimal ambiguity.
The naming pattern is consistently resource_action (e.g., email_send, calendar_create_event). Minor inconsistency: some resources use plural (emailfolders_) while others singular (email_, contact_), but the pattern is predictable overall.
85 tools is high but justified by the broad scope of Microsoft 365 coverage (email, calendar, contacts, files, search, account, cache). The number is borderline; some consolidation might be possible, but the tools cover distinct subdomains.
The tool surface is comprehensive for the covered subdomains (CRUD operations, search, sharing). Minor gaps exist (e.g., folder sharing, recurring events handling), but core workflows are well-supported.