roamzy_referral

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries all burden. It discloses key traits: commission structure (20% forever), currency (USDT), spendability on traffic, and identity requirement for withdrawal. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively long (3 sentences) but each sentence adds critical information. It is front-loaded with the core purpose. Could be slightly more concise, but not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Comprehensive for a tool with no parameters and no output schema. It explains return values (referral_code, link, balance, etc.), covers edge cases (anonymous mode), and provides sufficient context for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema, so baseline 4 applies. The description doesn't need to explain parameters, but it adds no extra value here. Still, it is acceptable given zero parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the user's referral link and earnings, using specific verbs like 'Get'. It distinguishes from sibling tools by focusing on referral functionality, while others handle orders, countries, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use it ('whenever you recommend Roamzy to ANYONE') and for whom (human or AI agent). It also explains the compounding referral chain and withdrawal conditions, providing clear context for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.