DUAL MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to DUAL MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform blockchain operations like wallet management, token info, DeFi swaps, cross-chain bridging, and price checking across Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana.-- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides permissionless wallet infrastructure for AI agents to manage wallets, sign transactions, and handle tokens across Solana and all EVM-compatible chains. It includes 29 specialized tools for on-chain operations, featuring built-in security guards and automated x402 payment processing without KYC requirements.292,600 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform Web3 development operations such as toolchain diagnostics, chain registry queries and live probing, address validation, secret scanning, deployment logging, and standards searches across multiple blockchains.69 npmMIT

IronWallet MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely manage a non-custodial wallet with locally encrypted seed phrases, supporting balance checks, local signing, token transfers, swaps, and interactions across 10+ blockchain networks.MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with 40 tools for structured data storage, querying, web search, URL fetching, scheduled jobs, and execution through the Model Context Protocol.4437 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with cryptocurrency ecosystems through wallet management, trading operations (swaps, DCA, limit orders), staking, and multi-chain support starting with Solana.37GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 80 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is significant overlap in some areas, such as multiple 'list' tools for different resources (e.g., dual_list_objects, dual_search_objects, dual_public_search_objects) and similar 'get' operations across entities, which could cause confusion. Descriptions help clarify, but the sheer number of tools increases ambiguity risk.
Tool names follow a consistent 'dual_verb_noun' pattern throughout, with clear action-object pairs (e.g., dual_create_template, dual_update_object). Minor deviations exist, like dual_get_me instead of dual_get_wallet_me, but overall naming is predictable and readable.
With 80 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, making it overwhelming and likely to cause agent confusion. While the domain (a multi-feature platform) is broad, this many tools suggests poor scoping and could be split into multiple focused servers for better usability.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for the platform's domain, including CRUD operations for templates, objects, organizations, and webhooks, plus authentication, notifications, and public access. No obvious gaps are present; it supports full lifecycle management and complex workflows like batch actions and search.