Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Metricairn

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query PostHog analytics data directly via tool calls, including insights, events, feature flags, trends, and persons.
      5
      498 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      First-party web analytics MCP server for AI agents, providing 42 tools to query traffic, events, funnels, conversions, sources, and performance data.
      40
      78 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools that support the Model Context Protocol to query Plausible Analytics traffic and conversion data, break metrics down by page, source, country, device, and UTM parameters, and compare two date ranges side by side. All query tools are read-only and work with either a hosted bring-your-own-key endpoint or a local STDIO install.
      4
      53 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with ClickHouse analytics through a semantic layer, exposing datasets and metrics for natural-language querying.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Metabase for database operations, SQL queries, dashboard management, and analytics automation.
      28
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap heavily: run_query subsumes query_metrics and breakdown (total/timeseries/breakdown modes), while compare and investigate_change both perform equal-duration period comparisons, and ask overlaps with the structured query tools. Funnel/goal/retention reports and the note/investigation lifecycle are clearly distinct, but the querying layer has fuzzy boundaries that invite misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    There is a recognizable verb_noun pattern for many tools (list_metrics, query_metrics, run_query, list_goals, get_realtime, detect_anomalies, investigate_change, get_investigation), but it is broken by bare nouns and ambiguous names (breakdown, compare, ask, funnel_report, revenue_attribution, mcp_usage). The mix is readable but not a predictable convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools this is on the heavy side for an analytics server, and the count is inflated by overlapping query paths that could be consolidated (e.g. query_metrics/breakdown folded into run_query). It is not egregious—each tool maps to a plausible analytics task—but it sits at the borderline of too many.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the analytics lifecycle well: discovery (list_metrics, list_dimension_values), querying, funnel/goal/retention/attribution reporting, anomaly detection, realtime, data-health checks, and investigation save/review. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no explicit breakdown-by-metric filter builder output, no scheduling), but core workflows are covered without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues