100pro-token-risk
Related Servers
Alternatives to 100pro-token-risk
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides live on-chain rug-pull and honeypot risk screening for EVM and Solana tokens, returning computed red flags and raw GoPlus Security data for contract or mint addresses.215 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides typed onchain verdicts for EVM tokens with calibrated probabilities, enabling agents to make informed decisions on tokens such as ape, watch, or avoid, along with risk scores.3 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenancePre-trade token safety check for AI agents. Simulates a sell before you buy, then reports honeypot, tax, liquidity, pair age, same-ticker impersonation and owner powers as one low/medium/high/unknown verdict. Fail-closed: when a critical check cannot run it answers unknown rather than guessing low. Publishes its own measured error rate with the benchmark harness in the repo.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to vet on-chain tokens before trading by running a single check_address call that detects honeypots and rug patterns and returns a PASS/WARN/BLOCK verdict with risk score and reasons across Ethereum, BSC, and Solana. Verdicts come from four parallel sources covering honeypot flags, contract audits, liquidity structure, and simulated buy-sell behavior, with graceful degradation flags when a source is unavailable.353 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOn-chain rug-pull & honeypot risk screen for ERC-20 tokens, providing a SAFE / CAUTION / HIGH-RISK verdict based on live public RPC reads.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run pre-sign risk checks on transactions, approvals, EIP-712 signatures, token addresses, wallet approvals, sanctions screening, and prompt-injection texts, returning green/orange/red verdicts with machine-readable reason codes before signing.1AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlapping or confusable tools. The tool's purpose is clearly and uniquely defined.
With a single tool, there are no naming conflicts or mixed conventions. 'token_risk_screen' is a clear, descriptive snake_case name.
Although one tool is minimal, it is comprehensive for the server's focused purpose of token risk screening. The scope is narrow enough that a single well-designed tool is reasonable.
The tool covers the core risk-screening dimensions: honeypot/tax/owner flags, LP-lock, mint/freeze authority, holder concentration, liquidity depth, wash-trade signals, and a verdict. Multi-token batching and multi-chain support further round out the surface.