Skip to main content
Glama
rnd-pro
by rnd-pro

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-pool-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An orchestration server that enables AI agents to collaborate across multiple AI models for advanced code analysis, debugging, and development workflows. It maintains context persistence across sessions, allowing agents like Claude to delegate subtasks to other models like Gemini or O3 seamlessly.
      41
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI coding CLIs (Claude Code, Gemini/Antigravity, Codex, and OpenCode) to collaborate as a coordinated team by routing cross-agent prompts, sharing messages and review tickets, tracking tasks on a shared store, and isolating each agent in its own Git worktree with turn-budget safeguards—all inspectable and steerable from a local web dashboard.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP orchestration server that uses Codex as lead planner and Antigravity as host to delegate and review bounded tasks with Git integration and persistent SQLite state.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to delegate scoped tasks across multiple providers like Codex, Claude Code, and Antigravity through a single local MCP server, with quota monitoring, notifications, and remote control via messaging apps.
      13
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but delegate_task and delegate_task_readonly are very similar, differing only in intent signal. The large number of tools (42) introduces some risk of confusion, though descriptions are clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_pipeline_status, create_skill, list_groups). Only minor deviations like bounce_back, but overall the pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 42 tools, the set is quite large for a single server. While each tool serves a specific purpose, the count exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15). It may overwhelm agents, but the complexity of the domain partially justifies the number.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows: delegation, pipelines, scheduling, groups, skills, workflows, messaging, and file tracking. Minor gaps exist, such as missing update/delete operations for pipelines and groups, but the set is generally comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive