MCP Simple Example
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| network-pingA | Send ICMP echo requests to a host to test connectivity and measure latency. |
| network-tracerouteA | Trace the route that packets take to reach a destination host. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: ping tests reachability and latency, while traceroute maps the network path. There is no realistic confusion between them.
Both tools follow the same network-<command> naming pattern, making the set predictable and easy to navigate. The consistency holds across both tools.
With only two tools, the server feels thin, but the pair of ping and traceroute forms a natural, coherent unit for basic network diagnostics. It is slightly under the typical well-scoped range but not unreasonable for a simple example server.
For basic network troubleshooting, ping and traceroute cover the two most common diagnostic needs: connectivity/latency and route/path analysis. A DNS lookup or port check would be a minor enhancement, but the current surface is not severely incomplete for the implied scope.