Catalyst Edge MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Catalyst Edge MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables biopharma catalyst research by aggregating signals from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, openFDA, and Yahoo Finance, with a single tool to audit a ticker/drug combination and return a forensic verdict.1037 npm5ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only research into parsed SEC events keyed by CIK and CUSIP, including 8-K items, Form 144, Form D, FTD series, XBRL facts, Form 4 insider trades, and 13F filings.MIT

mentu-navigator-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.63 npmApache 2.0- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceProvides MCP access to Contribution Compass's evidence catalog, enabling users to query curated open-source project activity, contribution opportunities, and observation histories.73MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying and analyzing changes in technology company documentation through MCP tools, including change feeds, company info, and evidence-based messaging.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local read-only search and retrieval of approved, current evidence via hybrid lexical and dense methods, with tools to get exact source spans, answer from cited passages, and create and verify recheckable evidence packets.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Each tool targets a distinct function: one for generating/assessing research scores on a ticker, the other for retrieving source records for a specific claim ID. No overlap in purpose or inputs.
Both tools share the 'catalyst_edge_' prefix and use snake_case with a clear noun structure. The pattern is consistent and predictable, making it easy to infer each tool's role.
With only two tools, the server has a minimal but plausible scope. While each tool clearly serves a distinct purpose, the very low number makes the set feel thin and raises expectations for more coverage.
The two tools cover a core research workflow (get score, then read claim sources), but the server lacks other potentially useful operations such as listing dossiers or searching claims. Given the apparent narrow domain, the surface is reasonably complete for a read-only assistant, though a bit minimal.