Catalyst Edge MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Catalyst Edge MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables biopharma catalyst research by aggregating signals from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, openFDA, and Yahoo Finance, with a single tool to audit a ticker/drug combination and return a forensic verdict.1064 npm5ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only research into parsed SEC events keyed by CIK and CUSIP, including 8-K items, Form 144, Form D, FTD series, XBRL facts, Form 4 insider trades, and 13F filings.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only, remote access to a crypto and AI news archive: fetching the latest articles, searching by keyword, retrieving full machine-readable article text, market ticker snapshots, and a public scoreboard of graded calls. No authentication or local installation is required.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides typed, read-only tools over SEC EDGAR for company lookup, filing lists, annual XBRL financial facts, and 10-K/10-Q item sections. Every result carries a source URL so answers can be grounded in and cite the underlying filings.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying daily research views on assets and macro themes, searching provider publications, retrieving daily digests, and reading structured central-bank policy signals from 200+ sources through a read-only bridge.MIT

mentu-navigator-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.90 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Each tool targets a distinct function: one for generating/assessing research scores on a ticker, the other for retrieving source records for a specific claim ID. No overlap in purpose or inputs.
Both tools share the 'catalyst_edge_' prefix and use snake_case with a clear noun structure. The pattern is consistent and predictable, making it easy to infer each tool's role.
With only two tools, the server has a minimal but plausible scope. While each tool clearly serves a distinct purpose, the very low number makes the set feel thin and raises expectations for more coverage.
The two tools cover a core research workflow (get score, then read claim sources), but the server lacks other potentially useful operations such as listing dossiers or searching claims. Given the apparent narrow domain, the surface is reasonably complete for a read-only assistant, though a bit minimal.