Skip to main content
Glama
rm0nroe

Catalyst Edge MCP

by rm0nroe

Related Servers

Alternatives to Catalyst Edge MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables biopharma catalyst research by aggregating signals from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, openFDA, and Yahoo Finance, with a single tool to audit a ticker/drug combination and return a forensic verdict.
      10
      37 npm
      5
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only research into parsed SEC events keyed by CIK and CUSIP, including 8-K items, Form 144, Form D, FTD series, XBRL facts, Form 4 insider trades, and 13F filings.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.
      63 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP access to Contribution Compass's evidence catalog, enabling users to query curated open-source project activity, contribution opportunities, and observation histories.
      7
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local read-only search and retrieval of approved, current evidence via hybrid lexical and dense methods, with tools to get exact source spans, answer from cited passages, and create and verify recheckable evidence packets.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct function: one for generating/assessing research scores on a ticker, the other for retrieving source records for a specific claim ID. No overlap in purpose or inputs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools share the 'catalyst_edge_' prefix and use snake_case with a clear noun structure. The pattern is consistent and predictable, making it easy to infer each tool's role.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server has a minimal but plausible scope. While each tool clearly serves a distinct purpose, the very low number makes the set feel thin and raises expectations for more coverage.

    Completeness4/5

    The two tools cover a core research workflow (get score, then read claim sources), but the server lacks other potentially useful operations such as listing dossiers or searching claims. Given the apparent narrow domain, the surface is reasonably complete for a read-only assistant, though a bit minimal.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues