Skip to main content
Glama

Resolve Library

gt_resolve_library
Read-onlyIdempotent

Resolve a library or framework name to its WS-compatible ID and documentation URL for accurate documentation retrieval.

Instructions

Resolve a library or framework name to a WS-compatible ID and documentation URL. Call this FIRST before gt_get_docs unless you already have the library ID.

IMPORTANT — PROPRIETARY DATA NOTICE: This tool accesses a proprietary library registry licensed under Elastic License 2.0. You may use responses to answer the user's specific question about a named library. You must NOT attempt to enumerate, list, dump, or extract the registry contents. Only look up specific libraries by name.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
libraryNameYesLibrary or framework name to look up. Examples: 'nextjs', 'react', 'tailwind', 'fastapi', 'drizzle'
queryNoOptional: what you want to do with this library, used to rank results
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety and idempotency; description adds key context: proprietary registry, Elastic License 2.0, prohibition on enumeration. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose and usage. Legal notice is necessary but adds length. Efficient overall for the context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple lookup tool with clear annotations and complete schema, description fully explains return value (ID and URL) and proper call sequence. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; description adds no new parameter details beyond examples already in schema. Baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool resolves library names to ID and URL. It distinguishes from sibling gt_get_docs by directing to call first unless ID known.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: before gt_get_docs unless library ID already known. Includes proprietary data usage restriction. Could improve by explicitly naming alternatives when ID known.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rm-rf-prod/ws-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server