Skip to main content
Glama
rlgrpe

camoufox-mcp

by rlgrpe
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to camoufox-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Camoufox Unified MCP Server

      tom613951
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform stealth browser automation and anti-detection web interaction, including session management, humanized interactions, and bypassing anti-bot/WAF protections.
      MIT

    • Superior Browser MCP

      SikandarMirza
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered browser automation with real profiles, supporting interaction, navigation, form filling, and advanced features like visual overlays and self-healing selectors.
      42
      1
      -

    • Playwright MCP Server

      Leviathangk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables browser automation and web scraping with multi-session management, supporting page navigation, element interaction, network request capture, and content extraction across multiple concurrent browser instances.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • surfsky-mcp by surfskyio

      surfsky-mcpofficial

      surfskyio
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables browser automation through Surfsky's cloud-based antidetect browser, allowing users to scrape pages, navigate and interact with websites, run JavaScript, take screenshots, and manage isolated sessions with custom profiles, proxies, and fingerprint settings.
      13
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct browser automation action (navigate, click, type, screenshot, etc.) with no overlap. Descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'browser_verb' pattern (e.g., browser_click, browser_navigate, browser_take_screenshot). The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the comprehensive coverage of browser automation operations justifies the count. Not excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    Covers all major browser interactions: navigation, clicking, typing, form filling, dropdowns, file upload, dialogs, tabs, screenshots, snapshots, console/network, JS evaluation, waiting, resizing, proxy config, install, close. No obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources