Skip to main content
Glama
rkram90

My UV MCP Server

by rkram90

Related Servers

Alternatives to My UV MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides a 'hello' tool to return a personalized greeting, demonstrating integration with Claude Desktop.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that bridges Claude AI with local Python execution, enabling personalized greetings and demonstrating local tool integration.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A getting started guide and template for creating Python-based MCP servers using uv for project management. Provides setup instructions for developing and testing MCP tools that can integrate with Claude Desktop.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A demonstration MCP server for local development and testing with Claude Desktop on WSL. Provides basic utility tools including greeting messages, echo functionality, and server information retrieval.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the mcp-framework for developing and managing custom tools. It provides a structured foundation for building and integrating modular components like data processors and API clients into Claude Desktop.
      2 npm
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool 'add_numbers' has a single, clearly defined purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in this set.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'add_numbers' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and with only one tool, there is no inconsistency to evaluate. The naming is straightforward and predictable in isolation.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for most practical server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. This feels thin and inadequate for handling any meaningful domain beyond a trivial operation, indicating a poor fit for typical MCP server use cases.

    Completeness1/5

    The server's purpose is unclear from the single tool, making it impossible to assess coverage meaningfully. With only a basic arithmetic operation, there are significant gaps in any plausible domain, rendering the tool surface severely incomplete for practical agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues