get_client
Retrieve details of a specific client using its unique ID for efficient client management.
Instructions
Get a specific client by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Client ID |
Retrieve details of a specific client using its unique ID for efficient client management.
Get a specific client by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Client ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only says 'Get' without mentioning permissions, error handling, or what happens if ID is not found.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool, description is adequate but could mention that it returns the full client object.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'id', and the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's 'Client ID'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'client', and distinguishes from siblings like 'get_clients' (plural) and 'get_client_time_entries'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'get_clients' for listing all clients.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rize-io/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server