Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
GIBWORK_LIVENoControls whether the server uses live Gibwork/Solana integration. Set to true to enable live mode.false
SOLANA_PRIVATE_KEYNoSolana private key used for Ed25519 signing. If not provided, the server automatically operates in safe mock/simulation mode with ephemeral session keypairs.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
gibwork_list_bountiesC

List live and ecosystem Gibwork bounties on Solana with query filters (min_reward, skill, status, keyword, sort_by).

gibwork_get_bountyB

Fetch full bounty metadata, escrow details, sponsor reputation, deadline, and requirements checklist.

gibwork_verify_deliverableC

Deterministically analyzes a local workspace against a Gibwork bounty requirements checklist, scoring compliance from 0-100% and generating a cryptographic deliverable fingerprint.

gibwork_submit_proofB

Prepares, cryptographically signs with a Solana Ed25519 keypair, and registers a bounty submission proof packet on Gibwork.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool maps to a distinct stage of a bounty workflow: browse (list_bounties), inspect (get_bounty), evaluate local work (verify_deliverable), and sign/register (submit_proof). There is no plausible confusion between listing many bounties versus fetching one, or between local verification and on-chain submission.

Naming Consistency5/5

All four names use a uniform `gibwork_` namespace prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (list_bounties, get_bounty, verify_deliverable, submit_proof). The convention is fully predictable and readable.

Tool Count4/5

Four tools is on the lean side but each earns its place within a narrow bounty-hunting scope, and there is no filler. It sits just below the ideal mid-range, leaving little room for auxiliary operations.

Completeness4/5

The core discovery-to-submission lifecycle is fully covered, including a verification step most servers would omit. Minor gaps remain: no way to check submission status or withdraw/resubmit a proof, and no agent-side profile or submission history lookup.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues