Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to studio-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to generate and validate multi-granularity storyboard assets from text prompts, including 2D SVG motion, 3D Blender depth/blockout, and SDXL ControlNet final images. It also supports vision-based self-correction and a SQLite knowledge database of successful recipes.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to ingest raw video clips, plan and edit a montage from natural-language prompts, and produce a rendered, beat-synced cut with matched music, subtitles, transitions, and picture-in-picture.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to script, narrate, source assets, and edit a validated NLE-style timeline with narration-anchored timing, then preview, check and render a finished vertical film with layout, loudness and delivery rules enforced. Every edit is atomic and undoable, so agents can iterate on real editor state instead of a fixed template.
      19
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a local LLM to direct Unreal Engine 5 scenes through verified task-level macros and bounded workflows, applying character animations, measuring poses and foot placement, and capturing evidence while restoring state on failure. It also supports plain-language orders for character actions, crowds, and reference-video generation without requiring a small model to compose hundreds of atomic engine tools.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: assemble builds the cut manifest, lock_campaign sets the visual look, plan_shots creates the shot plan, project_status reports stage completion, and qc_still performs quality control. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are not perfectly consistent: 'assemble' is a bare verb, while others follow verb_noun (lock_campaign, plan_shots) or noun_noun (project_status) patterns, and 'qc_still' uses an abbreviation. The naming is understandable but lacks a uniform convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 5 tools, the count is appropriate for the domain of film production planning and quality control. It covers the main workflow stages without being too heavy or too sparse, though a few more specialized tools could be added later.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core stages: planning, look locking, assembly, QC, and status tracking. Notable gaps like actual rendering or exporting are intentionally omitted per v1 scope. The surface is fairly complete for its intended purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues