Skip to main content
Glama

wait_for_job_completion

Poll job status with exponential backoff and jitter until the job completes, fails, or times out, ensuring reliable monitoring of asynchronous tasks.

Instructions

Poll job status with exponential backoff and jitter until it is completed/failed or times out.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
job_idYes
jitter_factorNo
timeout_secondsNo
max_interval_secondsNo
initial_interval_secondsNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions backoff, jitter, and timeout, but fails to disclose side effects, error handling, or state management. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundancy, every word adds value. Efficiently conveys core function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, reducing need for return value explanation. However, description omits behavior on interruption, error codes, or how to interpret completion status. Adequate for basic use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet description adds no detail on parameters like jitter_factor, timeout_seconds, or initial_interval_seconds. Relies entirely on defaults, leaving agent uninformed about tuning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it polls job status with exponential backoff and jitter until completion or timeout. Distinguishes from sibling tools like wait_for_batch_completion and get_parse_job_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use when needing to wait for job completion, but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives. No guidance on prerequisites or preferred scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/risha-max/0xpdf-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server