A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server that integrates Trello with AI agents, enabling natural language management of boards, lists, cards, checklists, attachments, and custom fields.
234 npm
2
MIT
trello-mcp
by rilolabs
Related Servers
Alternatives to trello-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis is an MCP Server for Trello that enables interaction with Trello's API through natural language, allowing management of boards, cards, lists, and other Trello resources.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Trello that enables comprehensive management of boards, cards, lists, labels, checklists, attachments, members, custom fields, and search through natural language.101 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Trello MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage boards, cards, and lists via the Model Context Protocol.252MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Trello integration, enabling management of workspaces, boards, lists, cards, and checklists through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Claude to Trello, enabling comprehensive management of boards, lists, and cards through natural language conversation. It supports a wide range of actions including searching cards, adding comments, managing checklists, and tracking board activity.234 npmISC
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 15 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct action-resource pair: card CRUD (create/get/update/move/archive/unarchive), comments, labels, boards, lists, and search. Even similar tools like get_cards vs get_card vs search_cards have clear differences in scope and return shape.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_*, create_card, update_card, move_card, archive_card, unarchive_card, add_comment, add_label, remove_label, list_boards. There are no mixed styles or vague verbs like 'process' or 'do_thing'.
Tool Count5/5
15 tools is at the upper end of the ideal range but well justified by the breadth of Trello operations covered: boards, lists, cards, labels, comments, search, and activity. Each tool serves a distinct purpose with no redundancy.
Completeness4/5
The card lifecycle is fully covered (create, read, update, archive/unarchive instead of permanent delete), plus labels, comments, search, and board activity. Minor gaps exist: no board or list creation/update/delete, but the server is clearly card-centric and archiving is intentionally used as a safe deletion alternative.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues