token-optimizer-jev-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to token-optimizer-jev-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables sending a shared context with multiple independent questions to TypeSafe's Jev model via the public OpenJEV API, returning typed judgments and probabilities (choice, score, or yes/no) instead of prose.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables any agent to ask typed questions (Noul, Choice, Score) against Jev's decision model and receive structured answers with probabilities, confidence, and an auditable act/review/abstain decision.270 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to obtain typed judgments from TypeSafe's Jev System One models, including yes/no probabilities, multiple-choice selections with distributions, and rubric-based scores, directly usable in code.51AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to consult TypeSafe's Jev through a judge tool, answering narrow typed questions with calibrated probabilities instead of prose.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding or reasoning agents to request structured judgments from TypeSafe's Jev model at decision points, including choices, scores, claim verification, and code reviews, with probabilities and confidence returned as data.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
jev_ask can handle label sets, rubrics, and yes/no questions, so it overlaps with jev_choice, jev_score, and jev_noul for single-question use. The specialized tools are individually clear, but an agent could reasonably hesitate between the generic ask tool and the specialized one.
All tools share a consistent jev_ prefix and lowercase snake_case style, with list_models and server_info following a recognizable pattern. The names score, ask, choice are concise, though jev_noul is cryptic and not clearly verb- or noun-shaped.
Six tools is well-scoped for a decision-serving MCP: four distinct question modes plus two informational endpoints. Each tool earns its place, and the count is comfortably inside the expected range.
The surface covers all stated capabilities: rubric scoring, label choice, yes/no probability, mixed parallel questions, model metadata, and server configuration. The explicit design limitation that Jev does not generate text explains why generation/rewrite tools are absent, leaving no obvious dead ends.