Publish accumulated graph operations as a named edit to your personal space, turning pending changes into a shareable, structured update.
Publish all accumulated ops as an edit to personal space
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Name for the edit |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.8.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations only indicate readOnlyHint=false, so the description adds value by specifying that all accumulated ops are published at once to personal space. However, it does not disclose side effects such as whether the op queue is cleared afterward or any auth requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that front-loads the action and contains zero redundant words. It is highly scannable and concise while still conveying the essential operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema, so the description is minimally viable. However, 'accumulated ops' and 'personal space' are left undefined, requiring the agent to infer context from sibling tools or session state.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and the 'name' parameter is already documented as 'Name for the edit'. The description adds no additional parameter semantics, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('publish') and resource ('edit to personal space') with a clear scope ('all accumulated ops'). It implicitly distinguishes from siblings like propose_dao_edit by targeting personal space rather than a DAO.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The phrase 'accumulated ops' implies a prerequisite (prior operations must have been accumulated), but no explicit when-to-use guidance or alternatives are provided. The agent must infer that this tool is for publishing after a session of op accumulation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.