Skip to main content
Glama
richelo

isitdisposable-mcp

by richelo

Related Servers

Alternatives to isitdisposable-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, bulk list cleaning, and signup risk assessment tools. It exposes three typed tools for agents: verify_email, clean_email_list, and assess_signup_risk, with real DNS MX checks and disposable domain detection.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a verify_email tool for checking email syntax, disposable domains, and MX records, returning a structured validity result.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Disposable email for humans and AI agents. Enables AI agents to create mailboxes and receive verification emails through an MCP server.
      36
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to validate email addresses and send emails via SMTP with zero external dependencies.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for disposable email — create inboxes, receive emails, and extract OTP codes. Let your AI agent sign up for services, wait for verification emails, and extract codes autonomously.
      7
      29 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, returning valid, invalid, or risky status with detailed checks and metadata. It enables verifying email addresses via a simple tool interface.
      3
      -

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check_email handles full addresses, check_domain handles bare domains, and check_batch handles mixed lists. While check_batch overlaps in capability, the single vs. batch distinction is explicit and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same check_ prefix followed by a noun (email, domain, batch), creating a predictable and consistent verb-noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for this service: single email, single domain, and batch. This covers the core use cases without bloat or unnecessary additions.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface fully covers the domain of disposable address checking: individual emails, individual domains, and batch processing. No obvious missing operations for a read-only verification service.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues