Skip to main content
Glama
richashworth

tlaplus-mcp

by richashworth

Related Servers

Alternatives to tlaplus-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates the Quint formal specification language into LLM workflows for accessible formal verification. It provides tools for type-checking, random simulation, exhaustive model checking, and syntax documentation.
      6
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Salesforce development tools (scan, lint, test, deploy, verify) to AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol, enabling programmatic interaction with Salesforce projects.
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Language Server Protocol (LSP) functionality as Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, enabling AI clients to programmatically analyze and edit code in any language supported by VS Code.
      8 npm
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any Model Context Protocol-compatible host (Claude Desktop, Cherry Studio, Cline, MCP Inspector) to call 8 plug-and-play tools over stdio: hotspot ranking, TC3 signing, text chunking, date calculation, read-only SQLite queries, webpage text extraction, JWT decode/verify, and health checks.
      26 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose covering different aspects of TLA+ workflow: parsing, model checking, simulation, coverage, trace generation, state graph analysis, evaluation, translation from PlusCal, and typesetting. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a consistent pattern with prefixes (tla_, tlc_, pcal_) indicating the tool, followed by a descriptive verb or noun. The only minor inconsistency is 'tla_state_graph' which deals with TLC-generated files, but overall the pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    9 tools is appropriate for a TLA+ toolset, covering essential operations without being too many or too few. Each tool earns its place in the workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core TLA+ lifecycle: parsing, evaluation, model checking, simulation, coverage, trace generation, state graph analysis, PlusCal translation, and typesetting. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit LTL property checking tool, but tlc_check handles properties; no distributed mode) but the surface is largely complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues