Skip to main content
Glama
richardoros

threadline-core

by richardoros

Related Servers

Alternatives to threadline-core

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that captures and recalls coding session memory (failures, decisions, diffs) for AI agents, enabling cross-agent continuity and preventing repeated mistakes.
      41 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for AI coding agents. Enables agents to save and recall decisions, patterns, bugs, and context across sessions via an MCP server with local SQLite storage.
      4 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that provides AI assistants with a shared, persistent SQLite-backed memory for storing and retrieving project context, decisions, and discoveries. It enables cross-session continuity and team-wide knowledge sharing to keep AI coding tools aligned and informed.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that persists AI coding agent memory and session context, enabling seamless resume across sessions with searchable memories and checkpoints.
      7 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides offline-first, persistent memory for AI coding assistants. It captures project decisions and conventions into a local SQLite database and syncs them to tool-specific memory files like CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: sessions, events, memory, loops, decisions, traps, findings, and evidence. Even the finding lifecycle tools (propose/confirm/resolve/dismiss) are clearly differentiated by their gating rules and effects.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., start_session, get_open_loops, mark_decision_outcome). Minor deviations like 'get_known_traps' are still readable and fit the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool earns its place given the broad domain (sessions, events, memory, state, loops, decisions, traps, findings, evidence). The count feels justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the full lifecycle for the core entities: sessions are started/ended, events are logged, loops can be listed/claimed/resolved, decisions can be queried and outcomes marked, findings progress from proposal to confirmation/resolution/dismissal, and evidence is retrievable. Minor gaps exist (no explicit create/delete for projects, no list_sessions), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues