Skip to main content
Glama
ricardoshuree

mcp-local-erp

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-local-erp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Desktop with direct access to your local file system for development tasks, enabling file operations (read, write, edit), directory browsing, command execution, and codebase search within a configured projects directory.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop or other MCP clients to execute shell commands, read/write files, and list directories on the local machine. Includes basic safety guardrails to block obviously destructive operations.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local file management through natural language interactions using the Gemini API, with tools for listing, reading, writing, deleting, and updating files.
      5
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All 7 tools have clearly distinct purposes: read/list for browsing, write for modifying, and propose/approve/reject/list_pending for managing the change-plan workflow. There is no ambiguity between them, and the propose/approve workflow is clearly chained.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow a consistent verb-based pattern: read_file, list_dir, write_file, propose_change, approve_change, reject_change, list_pending_changes. All use snake_case with verb-first naming. The only minor deviation is that 'list_pending_changes' mixes the noun 'changes' with 'list_dir' using 'dir', but this is negligible.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for a local ERP project server. Each tool earns its place: two for file browsing, one for writing, and four for the governance workflow around changes. No redundancy and no missing obvious categories.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers file read/write plus a complete change-approval workflow: propose, approve, reject, and list status. A minor gap is that there is no tool to retrieve or inspect a specific plan's details or diff before approving, which agents might need, but the core lifecycle is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues