obtener_licitacion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. 'Obtiene' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not mention behavior for invalid or missing IDs, authentication needs, or response details. It is not misleading, but it is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence with no filler. The operation, resource, and parameter are all front-loaded, and every word contributes value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter get-by-ID tool, the description covers the essential call pattern, and an output schema exists to explain return values. It lacks explicit sibling differentiation and edge-case behavior, but those are secondary given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does add meaning by describing the parameter as a numeric ID, and it is the only parameter, so an agent can infer what to pass. Still, no format example or further clarification is given beyond the schema's bare title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Obtiene') and resource ('datos de una licitación'), and clarifies that it operates by numeric ID. It is clear, though it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools such as buscar_procesos or resumen_licitaciones.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'dado su id numérico' implies this is for direct, single-record lookup when the ID is already known. However, it does not explicitly say when to use this tool instead of a search tool, nor does it name an alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.