wealthbox.events.create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It merely states 'Create event' with an example, without disclosing side effects, permission requirements, idempotency, or error behavior. For a mutating operation, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus a compact example, front-loaded and free of extraneous content. Every element earns its place, though the inline JSON could be slightly more readable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters, a nested body object, and no output schema or annotations, the description is far too minimal. It does not explain return values, required fields, validation rules, or how the additional properties in body are handled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It provides an example covering title, starts_at, and ends_at with format hints, but leaves 4 other parameters (body, location, category_id, description) unexplained. The additionalProperties body also lacks guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create event' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete, update, and list. The example adds contextual clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the verb 'create', but the description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update) or mention any prerequisites. No exclusions or alternative tools are referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.