Skip to main content
Glama

calculate_shipping

Calculate shipping rates using origin and destination details, weight, order amount, and item count. Optionally filter by services and packaging.

Instructions

Calculate shipping rates. POST /shipping/calculate. Required: companyCurrencyId, fromZip, fromCountry, zip, country, weight, orderAmount, itemCount. Optional: residential, street1, street2, city, state, services, packagingType.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
companyCurrencyIdYesCompany currency ID (required)
fromZipYesOrigin zip (required)
fromCountryYesOrigin country code (required)
zipYesDestination zip (required)
countryYesDestination country code (required)
weightYesWeight (required)
orderAmountYesOrder amount (required)
itemCountYesItem/order quantity (required)
residentialNoResidential address indicator
street1NoStreet line 1
street2NoStreet line 2
cityNoCity
stateNoState
servicesNoService IDs to filter
packagingTypeNoPackaging type
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions HTTP method and parameter list. Does not disclose side effects, idempotency, error handling, or whether calculation logs anything.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with action and endpoint. Efficient listing of required/optional params.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations; description omits what the response contains (rates, carriers, etc.). For 15 parameters, more context on assumptions and return structure is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description restates parameter names but adds no new meaning beyond the schema field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'calculate shipping rates' and the resource, using a specific verb-noun pair. No other sibling tool performs this function, so it is distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Lists required/optional parameters but does not explain preconditions or typical scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rhinosaas/rebillia-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server