get_feed
Fetch posts from your LinkedIn feed. Control how many posts to retrieve.
Instructions
Get posts from your LinkedIn feed
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | Number of posts to retrieve |
Fetch posts from your LinkedIn feed. Control how many posts to retrieve.
Get posts from your LinkedIn feed
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | Number of posts to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavior beyond fetching posts. Does not mention ordering, rate limits, authentication, or what happens with an empty feed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but under-specified. Not verbose, but could include more useful information without becoming too long.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple with 1 param and no output schema, but description does not clarify what 'posts from your LinkedIn feed' entails (e.g., recency, personal feed). Missing hints about return structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter 'count' with full schema description. Description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Get posts from your LinkedIn feed' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_post' (single post) or 'create_post'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_post' for a single post. No mention of context or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rgthelen/linkedin-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server