Skip to main content
Glama
rezmeplxrf

InsightSentry MCP

by rezmeplxrf

Related Servers

Alternatives to InsightSentry MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with financial tools including real-time quotes, backtesting, technical analysis, and multi-exchange data via a simple CLI interface.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides access to SiftingIO market data, including live prices, SEC filings, OHLCV bars, 13F holdings, market status, and economic calendar tools for AI assistants.
      36
      27 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An advanced MCP server for real-time worldwide stock market data, technical indicators, financials, news, and Python sandboxing with AI models, supporting US and Indian markets.
      29
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An enhanced MCP server that provides financial data and analysis tools for stocks, crypto, precious metals, and more, empowering AI agents with professional financial intelligence, including backtesting, ASCII charts, and simulated portfolios.
      58
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges AI assistants with Bloomberg Terminal data. It exposes 18 tools for reference, historical, technical analysis, screening, and calendar data through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides live financial data for any LLM agent, including stock quotes, crypto prices, SEC filings, XBRL financials, FX rates, and macro indicators, through ten MCP tools.
      11
      75 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are generally well-distinguished by asset class and action. The main ambiguity is between get_symbol_history (deep archive) and get_symbol_series (recent data), which have subtle distinctions that could cause misselection. Options endpoints (get_options_expiration, get_options_strike, list_options) are actually well-differentiated by filtering approach.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix dominating (14 tools). Minor deviations include 'list_options' (should be 'get_options' to match 'get_documents') and 'search_symbols' (semantically distinct from 'screen_' but slightly inconsistent). The 'screen_' and 'get_*_screener_params' patterns are consistently applied across asset classes.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 29 tools, this exceeds the 25+ threshold where toolsets typically become unwieldy. While the financial data domain is broad, the count feels heavy—screeners and their param getters for each asset class (8 tools total) could potentially be consolidated, as could the two historical data endpoints. Agents may struggle to navigate the full surface area efficiently.

    Completeness4/5

    Provides comprehensive coverage for financial market data: four asset classes with screeners (stocks, bonds, ETFs, crypto), options chains, fundamentals (meta, current, time-series), corporate calendars (earnings, dividends, IPOs), documents, and news. Minor gaps include the lack of a futures screener (despite having futures contract support) and no dedicated technical indicator endpoint outside of screening.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing