Skip to main content
Glama
US Business Verification MCP Server

US Business Verification MCP Server

by rezearcher

Related Servers

Alternatives to US Business Verification MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables screening companies or people against OFAC, UN, EU and UK sanctions lists, looking up SEC EDGAR records, checking domain age and email records, and compiling due-diligence reports with source links and a clear, review, or hold verdict.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables US business intelligence lookups including Secretary-of-State registrations, UCC liens, and TIN/EIN verification.
      417 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to check companies before payments, invoices, or contracts by resolving legal entities in GLEIF, walking parent chains, screening against OFAC, EU, UN, and UK sanctions lists, and validating EU VAT numbers in VIES.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify and search business entities across US state and international company registries, providing real-time confirmation of legal existence, status, and filings.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and compliance pipelines to run deterministic checks against FMCSA carrier authority, CMS NPI records, federal sanctions and exclusion lists, phone TCPA/DNC risk, SEC EDGAR, EU VAT, NHTSA VIN, and B2B email deliverability.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    verify_business, screen_sanctions, list_states and get_hosted_access each target a clearly different action/resource, so an agent can pick between them. The only soft overlap is that verify_business already screens against OFAC by default, leaving slight ambiguity about when to call screen_sanctions standalone (the description does clarify it is for names without a state lookup).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern: verify_business, screen_sanctions, list_states, get_hosted_access. Consistent verbs (verify/screen/list/get) with no camelCase or stylistic drift.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is lean but defensible for a focused verification server: one core lookup, one screening primitive, one discovery helper, one access-info helper. Slightly under-scoped because get_hosted_access is an upsell/informational tool rather than a functional capability, so the operational surface is effectively three tools.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle is covered: batch verification with structured audit records and no-match handling, direct sanctions screening, and state coverage discovery. Minor gaps exist — no standalone lookup by entity_id, no UCC-lien tool outside the Colorado attachment, and no way to enumerate or filter entities within a state.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues