SiYuan MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to SiYuan MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with SiYuan Note through its API, supporting notebook and document management, block operations, search, file operations, and more.6964 npm72MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to interact with SiYuan Note systems, allowing management of notebooks, documents, blocks, files, and more through natural language.34 npmISC
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with SiYuan Note for comprehensive notebook management, document editing, and block-level content operations. It supports advanced features like full-text search and SQL queries via secure API integration.327 npm39ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with SiYuan Note through its API for comprehensive note management. Supports searching, creating, editing documents, managing notebooks, and daily notes operations through natural language commands.18 npm15Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to safely read, search, edit, and organize SiYuan notes, with git-like document timeline and notebook-level permissions.23 npm108MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the SiYuan note-taking knowledge base through standardized MCP tools, supporting notebook/document/block operations with built-in sensitive data masking and notifications.2210MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct: each av_* tool targets a specific operation on Attribute Views (CRUD for rows, columns, and views). The generic command tools (executeCommand, queryCommands, help) are also separate, though executeCommand could potentially overlap with the others in vague ways. Minor confusion exists between av_updateRow and av_updateCell, but descriptions make the distinction clear.
The av_* tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., av_addRow, av_deleteRow, av_createAttributeView), but the generic tools (executeCommand, queryCommands, help) break this pattern. Mixed prefixes and lack of uniform style across the server result in moderate inconsistency.
With 11 tools, the count is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the set is neither bloated nor too sparse for the stated domain of Attribute View management plus command utilities.
The Attribute View lifecycle covers create, read, and update operations for structure and data, including row and column management. The only obvious gap is the lack of a delete view tool (av_deleteAttributeView), which means users cannot fully remove an Attribute View through this server. Minor gaps like renaming columns are also absent, but agents can work around these.