set_buzzer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the on/off behavior and parameter semantics but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or return value. Since annotations are absent, the description carries the full burden, and it provides only minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise with two clear sentences and an args list. Every element is necessary and front-loaded, with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple on/off tool lacking an output schema, the description covers the function and parameters adequately. It does not specify return behavior, but given the tool's simplicity, this is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaningful parameter context: 'device_id: The device_id from list_pets' and 'active: True to turn on, False to turn off'. This clarifies the source and effect beyond type-only schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool turns the tracker buzzer on or off, specifying the verb 'turn' and resource 'tracker buzzer'. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like set_led or set_live_tracking, which have similar patterns.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, it does not explain scenarios for turning the buzzer on/off compared to set_led or set_live_tracking.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.