Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
CLAUDE_MCP_ENTRYNoFull path to the `claude` program, when it cannot be found automatically.
CLAUDE_MCP_READ_DIRSNoExtra readable directories, separated by your platform's path separator.
CLAUDE_MCP_TIMEOUT_MSNoDefault per-run time limit.
CLAUDE_MCP_STAGING_DIRNoWhere run directories live. Default: `<your workspace>/.claude-staging`.
CLAUDE_MCP_ENV_PASSTHROUGHNoComma-separated names to forward to Claude Code even though they look like credentials or steer model routing.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
runA

Run one Claude Code task (claude -p) in an isolated scratch directory. Returns Claude's final message plus an artifact manifest (path, bytes, sha256 per file) — file bodies are NEVER included. Claude can read the directories you name but can only write inside its own scratch directory. Read the artifact paths yourself, review them, and only then copy what you approve into the workspace.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose—running a Claude Code task in an isolated scratch directory—is clearly stated and unambiguous.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool is named 'run', a simple verb that clearly reflects its action. No other tools exist to create inconsistency, so naming is perfectly predictable.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool is on the thin side for an MCP server, even one with a narrow focus. While it may be sufficient for the core operation, the rubric considers 1-2 tools borderline.

Completeness4/5

The core workflow—run a task, return the final message and artifact manifest—is covered. However, there is no explicit lifecycle management (e.g., cancel, list runs) or in-server artifact retrieval, though the latter is intentionally omitted for security.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues