Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
EvidenceLens MCP

EvidenceLens MCP

by returdex
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to EvidenceLens MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • corexense-mcp

      xli431
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to validate physical-AI evidence through synthetic scenario and episode reviews, explain beliefs from delayed or conflicting evidence, and audit simulation replays while tracing why a workflow pauses. Pairs local freshness checks with bounded cloud model review and exposes no actuator or arbitrary filesystem tools.
      5
      Apache 2.0

    • io.github.loopg/pramana-mcp

      reliai-in
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets an assistant read recorded production AI agent runs — steps, model and tool calls with arguments, and outcomes — along with the findings of comparison runs that checked a prompt or model change against those recordings, and verify a signed evidence bundle offline with no account or network. It is strictly read-only: no tool starts a replay or comparison, so nothing can spend money or act without a person deciding.
      5
      19 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • agent-evidence-mcp

      agent-evidence-mcpofficial

      probityai-archive
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables an assistant to verify whether claims about AI systems hold against supplied evidence bytes, replay conformance vectors, and inspect related terms and artifact digests offline without fetching, writing, or sending data.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    • smart-read-mcp

      smart-read-mcpofficial

      SylphxAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides a universal read path for agents to extract facts, metadata, and provenance from local files and guarded remote URLs without using generative LLMs.
      MIT

    • flameox

      berndkaya0853
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to turn explicit artifact paths or commands into bounded, locally captured runtime evidence such as profiles, traces, and benchmarks, with typed provenance, coverage, and limitations recorded. It requires no workspace initialization or project configuration, and offers optional durable preservation with replayable evidence identifiers.
      -

    • Watch Skill

      authrain-cloud-abdullahformuli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives any agent eyes and ears by indexing video, audio, and screen activity into searchable, timestamped frames, transcripts, and OCR text that answers can cite. It also evaluates frozen verification contracts over file digests, JSON values, SQL results, HTTP responses, and DOM state to return a deterministic verdict from a separate process.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation1/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no ambiguity between tools, but the single tool's purpose is vague and could overlap with future tools. Since there is no set to disambiguate, it scores minimal.

    Naming Consistency1/5

    With only one tool, naming consistency is trivial but the naming is not informative; 'review_evidence' is a generic name that doesn't indicate what it does with evidence. No pattern can be assessed.

    Tool Count1/5

    A single tool for a server called 'EvidenceLens MCP' that claims to 'review evidence' is too thin. The scope suggests a larger toolset for evidence review, but only one trivial tool is provided.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool description says 'Accept Phase 1 evidence review metadata and return a deterministic skeleton response.' This covers only a tiny fraction of what an evidence review workflow would need; there's no way to submit actual evidence, get details, update reviews, or handle later phases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources