Skip to main content
Glama
repocritics

repocritics-mcp-server

Official
by repocritics
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to repocritics-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mentu-navigator-mcp by mentu-ai

      mentu-navigator-mcpofficial

      mentu-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.
      42 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • codepilot

      ronronner02
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query previously analyzed GitHub repositories for architecture analysis, code review findings, and single-turn code Q&A with verifiable file and line references.
      MIT

    • AI Knowledge Base MCP Server

      Alpha-W0lf
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only hybrid RAG search and discovery over a local-first AI knowledge corpus, enabling semantic and keyword search, browse, digest, and status tools.
      4
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0

    • project-surface

      Richie11747
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query a repository's verified semantic model, including capabilities, ownership, contracts, constraints, impact, health, and verification status, without re-deriving project facts. It exposes read-only tools for inspecting, reasoning about, and verifying the provenance-tracked surface.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: search, repo metadata, wiki, reviews, categories, tags, and AI reports. There is no ambiguity between tools; even search_repos and get_repo are clearly differentiated by scope.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (search_repos, get_repo, get_wiki, list_reviews, list_categories, list_tags, get_ai_report). The naming style is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a repository information service. Each tool earns its place, covering search, individual fetching, lists, and premium content without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main read-only operations for the RepoCritics corpus: searching repos, fetching metadata, wiki, reviews, categories, tags, and AI reports. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to fetch a single review or filter repos by category directly, but these are not critical for the core workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources