A
licenseB
qualityC
maintenanceBridges Motion's AI-powered calendar and task management API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language management of tasks, projects, schedules, and more.
10
Apache 2.0
Motion MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Motion MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's AI-powered calendar and task management API with LLMs, enabling natural language management of tasks, projects, schedules, and more via the Model Context Protocol.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceBridges Motion's AI-powered calendar and task management API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol. It enables users to manage tasks, projects, schedules, and custom fields through natural language conversation.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's AI-powered calendar and task management platform with LLMs using the Model Context Protocol. It enables users to manage tasks, projects, and schedules through natural language conversation on desktop, web, and mobile.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language task, project, and schedule management.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, so you can manage tasks, search projects, check your schedule, and more — all through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct entity (tasks, projects, workspaces, users, schedules, search, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, statuses). Even with overlapping concepts like tasks and recurring tasks, descriptions clarify the boundary. No two tools appear to serve the same purpose.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the consistent 'motion_<plural_noun>' pattern in snake_case. The prefix 'motion_' unifies the set, and each resource name is intuitive. There are no stylistic deviations or mixed conventions.
Tool Count5/5
Ten tools is appropriate for a project management API covering major resources and capabilities. The count is neither excessive nor thin, and each tool represents a meaningful domain. Some tools bundle many operations, but this is reasonable.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers core entities: tasks, projects, workspaces, users, schedules, search, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, and statuses. However, project management is incomplete with only create/list/get for projects, missing update/delete. Also, user management might lack full CRUD, but it's less critical. Overall, minor gaps but most workflows are covered.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues