mcp-scholar
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-scholar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for searching Google Scholar, enabling paper search, author lookup, citation tracking, and BibTeX export for AI assistants and automation workflows.35 PyPI2MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching Google Scholar papers with year filtering, deduplication, and proxy support. Also provides paper detail retrieval, TF-IDF relevance analysis, and chart generation via MCP tools.4-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenance🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access Google Scholar papers through a simple MCP interface.405-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that allows users to search Google Scholar for academic papers by topic, author, and year range without requiring API keys. It utilizes web scraping to provide paginated results for research and academic exploration through natural language.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables academic research by searching Google Scholar, fetching paper content, and converting web pages to clean Markdown.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and access academic papers from Google Scholar via MCP protocol, with support for keyword, author, and year filtering, CAPTCHA handling, and BibTeX retrieval.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
There is significant overlap between adaptive_search and scholar_search, both performing Google Scholar searches with similar parameters, which creates ambiguity. Additionally, summarize_papers appears to combine searching and summarization, potentially overlapping with the search tools, though its summarization aspect provides some distinction.
Most tools follow a clear noun_verb or verb_noun pattern (e.g., adaptive_search, paper_detail, summarize_papers), with consistent snake_case throughout. The only minor deviation is health_check, which fits the pattern but stands out as a utility tool rather than a core scholarly function.
With 7 tools, the count is reasonable for a scholarly search server, covering key operations like searching, retrieving details, and summarizing. However, the overlap between some tools suggests the set could be streamlined without losing functionality, making it slightly over-scoped.
The toolset covers core scholarly functions well, including searching, retrieving paper details, references, and scholar profiles, with summarization as an advanced feature. A minor gap is the lack of tools for managing saved papers or citations, but the existing tools support most common workflows without dead ends.