Skip to main content
Glama

List favorites

list_favorites

Lists your favorite memes with their notes, ordered newest first and scoped to your tenant, so you can review saved items quickly.

Instructions

Lists your favorite memes with notes, newest first (tenant-scoped).

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_favorites"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, and it does disclose three useful traits: results are ordered newest first, are tenant-scoped, and include notes. It omits pagination/result-count limits and any permission or failure behavior, which matters for an unbounded list operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with the verb first and the qualifiers ('with notes', 'newest first', 'tenant-scoped') packed in parentheses. Every clause carries information; no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-param read tool with no output schema, the description covers what is returned (favorites with notes), ordering, and scoping. Only the absence of pagination or result-size expectations keeps it from being fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline applies. The sentence usefully explains that output is ordered newest first, which is the only knob-like behavior available.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Lists your favorite memes') and adds scope details ('with notes, newest first, tenant-scoped') that an agent can act on. It doesn't distinguish itself from the sibling list_memes, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the name and description—retrieve the caller's favorited memes—but there is no explicit when-to-use versus list_memes, and no mention of favorite_meme for adding or when results would be empty. Adequate but leaves routing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.