PostMD MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to PostMD MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides powerful Markdown document editing capabilities with thread-safe operations, atomic transactions, and comprehensive validation.104MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables sharing Markdown documents for collaborative review with inline annotations and structured change requests.18 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to publish HTML or Markdown to a public URL with a single HTTP POST, automatically converting Markdown to a styled webpage, with no account or setup required.5 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePublish HTML or markdown artifacts (reports, dashboards, demos) as instant shareable links with TTL expiry, social preview cards, and optional password protection. Works with the hosted service or a self-hosted instance.111 npm13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePublish and manage shareable HTML/Markdown pages with access control and comments via MCP clients.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePublishes AI-generated HTML and Markdown to a hosted, shareable URL with versioning, theming, and access control.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: document CRUD, note lifecycle, group management, and attachment upload are cleanly separated. The only near-overlaps (get_document vs get_document_raw, list_notes vs list_my_notes) are explicitly disambiguated in the descriptions.
All tools use the postmd_ prefix and a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern such as list_, create_, update_, delete_, and resolve_. Minor variations like add_note or move_document_to_group are still readable and predictable.
At 21 tools the server is above the usual 3-15 sweet spot, but the count is justified by covering documents, groups, and notes as separate lifecycles. Each tool has a concrete job, so the set feels slightly heavy rather than bloated.
Document, group, and note create/read/update/delete flows are substantively covered, including file-based and raw-content variants. The main gaps are the lack of a direct list-my-documents or global search endpoint, and attachments only support upload with no management/delete tools.