Skip to main content
Glama
refreshdotdev

WebEvalAgent MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to WebEvalAgent MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to access live console logs, errors, and network requests from web applications via a local WebSocket connection, without copying data to chat.
      11 npm
      18
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate and debug real Chromium browsers with capabilities like screenshots, video recording, performance analysis, visual regression testing, and OCR text extraction.
      13
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Bridges AI coding agents with the browser to provide visual debugging, real-time error capture, screenshot capabilities, DOM inspection, and interactive wireframing through a reverse proxy with injected developer tools.
      34 npm
      21
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to debug frontend applications by providing direct access to browser DevTools, React state, DOM inspection, and runtime debugging capabilities. Bridges the gap between AI and complex web applications for autonomous debugging and issue resolution.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes with no overlap. setup_browser_state handles browser authentication and state saving, while web_eval_agent performs UX/UI evaluation of web applications. An agent would never confuse these tools as they serve different phases of the workflow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case naming. setup_browser_state and web_eval_agent use clear action-oriented verbs followed by descriptive nouns, creating a predictable naming convention throughout the server.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, this server feels severely under-equipped for its apparent purpose of web evaluation. A comprehensive web evaluation system would typically need tools for navigation, interaction simulation, accessibility testing, performance measurement, and result analysis beyond just setup and evaluation.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for web evaluation. While setup and evaluation are covered, there are significant gaps: no tools for configuring evaluation parameters, managing browser sessions, analyzing results programmatically, testing specific components, or handling different evaluation methodologies. The server provides only basic endpoints without supporting the full evaluation workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive