Skip to main content
Glama
redfox-data

redfox-mcp

Official
by redfox-data

gpt_image_result

Retrieve the status, image paths, and fail reason of a GPT image generation task using its task ID. Use this tool when a previous image generation request times out and returns a task ID.

Instructions

查询 GPT 图片生成任务结果(含 status/imagePaths/failReason)。 仅在 gpt_image_generate 超时返回 taskId 后使用。

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
task_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

在没有注释的情况下,描述承担了行为透明度的全部责任。它准确说明了这是一个查询操作而非生成操作,并指明返回内容包含可能出现的失败原因(failReason),但未明确说明查询是否是幂等的或可能多次调用产生的影响(如是否消耗配额),因此扣1分。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述非常简洁,仅两句话,第一句说明功能,第二句给出使用条件,无冗余内容。但第二句使用了中文句号,结构合理,信息密度高,完全符合前端加载原则。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

考虑到工具只有一个参数,且有输出模式,描述完整覆盖了使用场景和返回的关键字段(status/imagePaths/failReason),无需额外补充,对于其复杂度来说非常完整。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

参数描述覆盖率为0%,描述承担了完全责任。它提到了taskId的上下文(来自gpt_image_generate超时后返回),但未在描述中显式说明task_id参数的具体格式或限制(如字符串长度)。由于只有一个参数且上下文已暗示,额外信息需求不高,但仍有微小提升空间。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述清晰地声明了工具用于查询GPT图片生成任务的结果,并明确列出了返回内容(status/imagePaths/failReason),动词“查询”和资源“GPT图片生成任务结果”非常具体,且与同类工具(如doubao_image_pro_result)有区分。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述明确给出了使用条件:仅在gpt_image_generate超时返回taskId后使用。这直接告诉代理何时应该使用此工具,以及避免在任务未超时或没有taskId时调用,提供了清晰的上下文和排除条件。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/redfox-data/redfox-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server