Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to edinet-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides programmatic access to Japan's EDINET system to search for listed companies and retrieve annual or quarterly financial reports. It parses XBRL filings into structured data, enabling AI assistants to analyze balance sheets, income statements, and cash flows.
      123 PyPI
      18
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables access and analysis of Japanese corporate financial data (PL/BS/CF) via EDINET API. Supports searching companies, listing reports, and comparing financials through natural language queries.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Structured financial data for ~3,800 Japanese listed companies from EDINET regulatory filings — financials, major shareholders, segments, executive compensation, and corporate history. Remote MCP over HTTPS with OAuth 2.0, free tier.
      13
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search verified Japanese corporate records — EDINET XBRL financials, 13-digit corporate numbers, major shareholders, and gBizINFO certifications — locally through a single knowledge-search tool with keyword, fuzzy, semantic, or hybrid retrieval. It also maps J-GAAP, US GAAP, and IFRS concepts so filings can be read in English without mistranslating terms like 営業利益 and 経常利益.
      7
      39 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Standardizes XBRL financial data from US SEC and European ESEF filings for LLM agents, enabling querying normalized financial facts like revenue and total assets across issuers and taxonomies.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct and non-overlapping purpose: search_company resolves names to codes, list_companies filters by criteria, get_financials retrieves detailed financials for one company, and compare_companies compares multiple companies. No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: search_company, list_companies, get_financials, compare_companies. This is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of accessing Japanese company financial data. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the key workflows: discovering companies (search and list), retrieving financial data (get_financials), and comparing metrics (compare_companies). A minor gap might be the lack of time-series or direct filing access, but the core is solid.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues