Readwise MCP
OfficialMCP de lectura inteligente
Descripción general
El Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) estandariza cómo las aplicaciones proporcionan contexto a los Modelos de Lenguaje Grandes (LLM), lo que garantiza una separación clara entre la gestión del contexto y la interacción directa con los LLM.
Este proyecto es un servidor MCP local diseñado para actuar como puente entre los clientes LLM (como Claude ) y Readwise .
Related MCP server: Reader MCP Server
Instalación en Claude
Asegúrese de tener Node instalado.
Abra la aplicación de escritorio de Claude.
Vaya a Configuración > Desarrollador.
Haga clic en
Edit Config.Agregue la siguiente entrada al archivo
claude_desktop_config.json, reemplazando el valorACCESS_TOKENcon su token de acceso Readwise .
{
"mcpServers": {
"Readwise MCP": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@readwise/readwise-mcp"
],
"env": {
"ACCESS_TOKEN": "XXXXXXXXX"
}
}
}
}Solución de problemas
Para obtener orientación general sobre resolución de problemas, consulte la sección oficial de solución de problemas del Protocolo de contexto de modelo de Claude Desktop.
A continuación se presentan soluciones específicas a problemas comunes que hemos encontrado y resuelto.
"No se pudo conectar al servidor MCP Readwise MCP"
Una razón muy probable para que esto suceda es que tengas configurada una versión incorrecta de npx/Node. Si usas nvm , prueba a ejecutar nvm use 18 en tu terminal. De lo contrario, considera reinstalar Node.
Errores al llamar a herramientas Readwise
Al usar este servidor MCP, es posible que ocasionalmente experimente errores de MCP durante sus conversaciones con Claude. Si experimenta estos errores, le recomendamos cambiar entre diferentes modelos de Claude (por ejemplo, de Claude 3.5 Haiku a Claude 3.7 Sonnet), ya que esto suele resolver el problema.
Available Tools
1 toolsearch_readwise_highlightsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vector_search_term | Yes | ||
| full_text_queries | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v0.0.2- Changed
search_readwise_highlights1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / full_text_queries / maxItemsAdded value: +8
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
search_readwise_highlights
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with other tools. Its purpose is clearly identifiable from its name despite the missing description.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (search_readwise_highlights). With only one tool, naming consistency is inherently maintained.
A single tool is far too limited for a Readwise MCP server, which would be expected to support listing, retrieving, tagging, or managing highlights in addition to searching.
The surface is severely incomplete: only a search operation is exposed, with no way to retrieve specific highlights, browse by tag, or perform any other meaningful Readwise actions. This creates a dead-end workflow for most use cases.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Zotero MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT: search, citations, safe writes, PDF passages and pages.
A Model Context Protocol server for Wix AI tools
- QuallaaOAuthcom.quallaa
Talk to your public-facing AI from any MCP client — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol Server that enables language models to access and manipulate Readwise documents and highlights programmatically.49-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects MCP-compatible clients like Claude and VS Code to your Readwise Reader library, allowing them to list, retrieve, and update documents in your personal knowledge repository.711MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants with access to your Obsidian vault through the Obsidian Local REST API plugin.6,303 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server enabling Claude to read, write, search, and analyse your Obsidian vault with advanced research capabilities.1MIT